Greg M. Smith

1.5k citations
77 papers · 884 · h-index 15

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
  • Health top 10%
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Papers in

Greg M. Smith

67 papers receiving 761 citations

Peers

Greg M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Religious studies 116
  • Health 94
  • Social Psychology 140
  • Literature and Literary Theory 78
  • Development 24
Replace Thomas Paine with:
Thomas Paine United Kingdom
Robert L. Fowler United States
Eric M. Meyers Canada
John Durham Peters United States
Terry Cook Canada
Stephen W. Melville United States
Eric Matthews United Kingdom
Howard M. R. Williams United Kingdom
Pieter François United Kingdom
Richard A. Lanham United States
Greg M. Smith relative to Thomas Paine United Kingdom Thomas Paine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.7×
Thomas Paine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Greg M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg M. Smith. The network helps show where Greg M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Greg M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Greg M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Greg M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003157
2 201683
3 200758
4 201644
5 200541
6 200836
7
Ecology and distribution of eastern Gulf of Mexico reef fishes
197635
8 201229
9 200426
10 201424
11 199224
12
Rational-emotive therapy and the reduction of interpersonal anxiety in junior high school students.
198423
13 201621
14 201318
15 202117
16 195815
17 201814
18 201713
19 202211
20 201711

About Greg M. Smith

Greg M. Smith is a scholar working on Religious studies, Health, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 77 papers that have together received 884 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (11 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (10 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (7 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (6 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (6 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (5 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (116 citations), Health (94 citations), Social Psychology (140 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (78 citations) and Development (24 citations). Greg M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Leslie J. Francis, Claes M. E. Beckman, Marc L. Berger, Amy P. Abernethy, Melissa D. Curtis, James Harnett, Suman Banerjee, Arunesh Mishra, Miles Ogborn and Gaynor Bagnall. Their work appears in journals such as HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, Theology, Cinema Journal, Implicit Religion and Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact