Grant Cottam

24 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Grant Cottam's Hit Papers

The Use of Distance Measures in Phytosociological Sampling 1956 · 1.8k citations
1.8k0+23+46Years since publication50010001.5k

Peers

Grant Cottam
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.6k
  • Forestry 210
  • Ecology 1.2k
  • Ecological Modeling 162
  • Global and Planetary Change 763
Replace John T. Curtis with:
John T. Curtis United States
Rexford F. Daubenmire United States
P. D. Coker United Kingdom
R. M. Misra
Carl D. Monk United States
John P. Barkham United Kingdom
Jack H. Burk United States
J. A. Ludwig Australia
Martin Kellman Canada
Tad Weaver
Grant Cottam relative to John T. Curtis United States John T. Curtis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
John T. Curtis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grant Cottam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grant Cottam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grant Cottam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grant Cottam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grant Cottam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grant Cottam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grant Cottam. The network helps show where Grant Cottam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Grant Cottam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grant Cottam Line = papers co-authored together Grant Cottam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Use of Distance Measures in Phytosociological Sampling
Hit paper breakdown →
19561784
2 1965171
3 1953170
4 1971122
5 198593
6 196966
7 196764
8 196063
9 197956
10 196650
11 197846
12 198240
13 196833
14 196028
15 196720
16 195720
17 196718
18 197416
19 197214
20 197313

About Grant Cottam

Grant Cottam is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Chemistry, Plant Science, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (12 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (5 papers), Ecology and Conservation Studies (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Forest ecology and management (3 papers) and Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.6k citations), Forestry (210 citations), Ecology (1.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (162 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (763 citations). Grant Cottam has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John T. Curtis, Kenneth Andrew Kershaw, Allan N. D. Auclair, J. T. Curtis, F. Glenn Goff, Bruce McCune, Edward W. Beals, Paul G. Risser, Richard J. Vogl and ROBERT H. WHITTAKER. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Science, Journal of Wildlife Management and Ecological Monographs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact