Graham Rees
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- History of Science and Medicine
- History of Science and Natural History
- Philosophy top 1%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Papers in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 6
- History of Science and Medicine 5
-
- History and Developments in Astronomy 6
- Journals
- Ambix (7 papers)Annals of Science (2 papers)Huntington Library Quarterly (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (2 papers)Oxford University Press eBooks (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSingapore
In The Last Decade
Graham Rees
21 papers receiving 166 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- History and Philosophy of Science 347
- Philosophy 215
- Anthropology 96
- History 103
- General Psychology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Graham Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Rees. The network helps show where Graham Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Graham Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 77 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 76 | |
| 3 | 1975 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 42 | |
| 5 | The Oxford Francis Bacon | 1996 | 35 |
| 6 | 1981 | 25 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 18 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1975 | 13 | |
| 10 | Philosophical Studies c.1611-c.1619 | 1996 | 11 |
| 11 | 1975 | 9 | |
| 12 | The Instauratio Magna: Last Writings | 2000 | 4 |
| 13 | 1979 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 15 | Quantitative reasoning in Francis Bacon's Natural Philosophy | 1985 | 3 |
| 16 | Novum organum and associated texts | 2004 | 3 |
| 17 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 18 | Francis Bacon's natural philosophy : a new source : a transcription of manuscript Hardwick 72A with translation and commentary | 1984 | 2 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 20 | Francis Bacon's Natural Philosophy a New Source, a Transcription of Manuscript Hardwick 72a | 1984 | 1 |
About Graham Rees
Graham Rees is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, History, Archeology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 22 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Developments in Astronomy (6 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (6 papers), History of Science and Medicine (5 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Medical History and Innovations (1 paper), Historical and Architectural Studies (1 paper), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper) and Science Education and Perceptions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (347 citations), Philosophy (215 citations), Anthropology (96 citations), History (103 citations) and General Psychology (8 citations). Graham Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Francis Bacon and Lisa Jardine. Their work appears in journals such as Ambix, Annals of Science, Huntington Library Quarterly, Cambridge University Press eBooks and Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.