Alan Gabbey
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- History of Science and Medicine
- Philosophy top 2%
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
Papers in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 4
- History of Science and Medicine 2
- History of Science and Natural History 2
-
- History and Developments in Astronomy 3
- Relativity and Gravitational Theory 1
- Co-authors
- Michael Della Rocca (1 shared paper)Jonathan Bennett (1 shared paper)Wim Klever (1 shared paper)Richard H. Popkin (1 shared paper)Don Garrett (1 shared paper)Pierre‐François Moreau (1 shared paper)Edwin Curley (1 shared paper)Alan Donagan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Isis (2 papers)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2 papers)Journal of the History of Ideas (2 papers)Journal of the history of philosophy (1 paper)Endeavour (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alan Gabbey
11 papers receiving 121 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- History and Philosophy of Science 72
- Philosophy 113
- History 13
- Anthropology 12
- Religious studies 6
Countries citing papers authored by Alan Gabbey
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Gabbey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Gabbey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Gabbey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Gabbey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Gabbey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Gabbey. The network helps show where Alan Gabbey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alan Gabbey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 113 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1973 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 0 |
About Alan Gabbey
Alan Gabbey is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 167 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (3 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (3 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers) and Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (72 citations), Philosophy (113 citations), History (13 citations), Anthropology (12 citations) and Religious studies (6 citations). Alan Gabbey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Della Rocca, Jonathan Bennett, Wim Klever, Richard H. Popkin, Don Garrett, Don Garrett, Pierre‐François Moreau, Edwin Curley, Alan Donagan and Margaret D. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Isis, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Journal of the History of Ideas, Journal of the history of philosophy and Endeavour.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.