Graham Hocking

15 papers receiving 633 citations

Peers

Graham Hocking
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 173
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 53
  • Emergency Medical Services 73
  • Pharmacology 148
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
Replace James W. Ibinson with:
James W. Ibinson United States
E. Gaser Germany
Susanne Ilkjær Denmark
Seza Apilioğulları Türkiye
Arun Prasad Canada
Kentaro Tsueda United States
Barry Campbell United States
Michael P. Mangione United States
H. Gilly Austria
Anthony Plunkett United States
Graham Hocking relative to James W. Ibinson United States James W. Ibinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
James W. Ibinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Hocking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Hocking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Hocking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Hocking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Hocking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Hocking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Hocking. The network helps show where Graham Hocking may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Graham Hocking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graham Hocking Line = papers co-authored together Graham Hocking links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2003252
2 201198
3 201178
4 201047
5 201230
6 201329
7 201028
8 201124
9 201122
10 201017
11 201013
12 201111
13
Ketamine: Does Life Begin at 40?
20079
14 20104
15 20101
16
Postherpetic neuralgia: an update on management
20020

About Graham Hocking

Graham Hocking is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology and Ophthalmology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 663 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (9 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (173 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (53 citations), Emergency Medical Services (73 citations), Pharmacology (148 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (21 citations). Graham Hocking has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Cousins, James E. Graham, Erin D. Giles, Scott Carey, William M. Weightman, Catherine L. Smith, N. M. Gibbs, Kevin Murray, Eric Visser and Stephan A. Schug. Their work appears in journals such as Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact