Graham Calvert

680 citations
21 papers · 511 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Graham Calvert

21 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Graham Calvert
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Computational Mechanics 154
  • Food Science 92
  • Ocean Engineering 76
  • General Materials Science 10
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 50
Replace M. Ertan Taskin with:
M. Ertan Taskin United States
Yang Meng China
M.J. Patel Australia
Maysam Saidi Iran
Zhaochen Jiang China
Bingjing Guo China
W. Vicente Mexico
Jingchun Wu China
Murat Doğru United Kingdom
Yude Liu China
Graham Calvert relative to M. Ertan Taskin United States M. Ertan Taskin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
M. Ertan Taskin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Calvert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Calvert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Calvert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Calvert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Calvert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Calvert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Calvert. The network helps show where Graham Calvert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graham Calvert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graham Calvert Line = papers co-authored together Graham Calvert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017131
2 200983
3 201460
4 201246
5 201534
6 201025
7 201325
8 202018
9 201214
10
Mechanical strength repercussions of various fixative storage methods on bone.
200613
11 200712
12 201410
13 201510
14 20129
15 19717
16 20196
17 19943
18 20212
19 20241
20 20091

About Graham Calvert

Graham Calvert is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Surgery, Mechanical Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Granular flow and fluidized beds (9 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (5 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (4 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (2 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (2 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (154 citations), Food Science (92 citations), Ocean Engineering (76 citations), General Materials Science (10 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (50 citations). Graham Calvert has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mojtaba Ghadiri, Umair Zafar, J.A.S. Cleaver, Vincenzino Vivacqua, Darrel S. Brodke, Brandon D. Lawrence, Colin Hare, Kent N. Bachus, Ali Hassanpour and Amir M. Abtahi. Their work appears in journals such as Powder Technology, Advanced Powder Technology, Journal of Spine Surgery, Process Safety and Environmental Protection and Orthopedics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact