Graeme Smith
Impact in
- Development top 2%
- International Development and Aid
- Microbiology top 5%
- Microbial infections and disease research
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 4
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 3
-
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance 7
- Co-authors
- Denghua Zhang (2 shared papers)J H Lumsden (2 shared papers)E. J. Stott (1 shared paper)J. Jebbett (1 shared paper)Peter Luther (1 shared paper)A.P. Collins (1 shared paper)L.H. Thomas (1 shared paper)J.B. Derbyshire (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Heart Journal (3 papers)Pacific Affairs (2 papers)Veterinary Record (2 papers)The China Journal (2 papers)Research in Veterinary Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Graeme Smith
57 papers receiving 788 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Development 77
- Microbiology 71
- Political Science and International Relations 217
- Agronomy and Crop Science 73
- Sociology and Political Science 243
Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Smith. The network helps show where Graeme Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graeme Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 125 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 86 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 58 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 55 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 41 | |
| 8 | 'Faith' in urban regeneration?: Engaging faith communities in urban regeneration | 2003 | 39 |
| 9 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1969 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 12 | 1978 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1979 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 12 |
About Graeme Smith
Graeme Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Demography, Development and Food Science, having authored 63 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (8 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (7 papers), International Development and Aid (5 papers), Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows (4 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (4 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (3 papers), Music History and Culture (3 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (77 citations), Microbiology (71 citations), Political Science and International Relations (217 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (73 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (243 citations). Graeme Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Denghua Zhang, J H Lumsden, E. J. Stott, J. Jebbett, Peter Luther, A.P. Collins, L.H. Thomas, J.B. Derbyshire, David Foreman and Michael E. Boulton. Their work appears in journals such as American Heart Journal, Pacific Affairs, Veterinary Record, The China Journal and Research in Veterinary Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.