Graeme Halliday

548 citations
19 papers · 387 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Graeme Halliday

18 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Graeme Halliday
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Demography 111
  • Clinical Psychology 155
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 77
  • General Health Professions 67
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 42
Replace Helen Evert with:
Helen Evert Australia
Bère Miesen Netherlands
Janet Holmshaw United Kingdom
Madeline Romaniuk Australia
Ludwig Schindler Germany
Christine Paprocki United States
Verônica de Medeiros Alves Brazil
Kristina S. M. Harter United States
Darren L. Bowring United Kingdom
Vlatka Boričević Maršanić Croatia
Graeme Halliday relative to Helen Evert Australia Helen Evert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Helen Evert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Halliday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Halliday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Halliday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Halliday. The network helps show where Graeme Halliday may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graeme Halliday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graeme Halliday Line = papers co-authored together Graeme Halliday links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200083
2 200662
3 201039
4 200936
5 201220
6 199920
7 200919
8 201818
9 201916
10 199515
11 201015
12 201112
13 20126
14 20196
15 20086
16 20195
17 20135
18 20223
19
What we don't know: An agenda for further research into severe domestic squalor and self neglect
20031

About Graeme Halliday

Graeme Halliday is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Genetics, Small Animals and Pharmacology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (7 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Parkinson's Disease and Spinal Disorders (1 paper), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper), Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (111 citations), Clinical Psychology (155 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (77 citations), General Health Professions (67 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (42 citations). Graeme Halliday has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Snowdon, Alastair Macdonald, Michael Philpot, Sube Banerjee, Ajit Shah, Gordon Johnson, Chanaka Wijeratne, Glenn E. Hunt, Carol Gregory and John R. Hodges. Their work appears in journals such as International Psychogeriatrics, International Clinical Psychopharmacology, The Medical Journal of Australia, BMC Psychiatry and Australian Veterinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact