G.P. Ford
Impact in
- Dermatology top 5%
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Skin Protection and Aging
-
- Nail Diseases and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Medicine and Dermatology Studies History 2
- Contact Dermatitis and Allergies 2
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases 1
- Skin Diseases and Diabetes 1
-
- Skin and Cellular Biology Research 2
- Co-authors
- F. A. Ive (2 shared papers)Sam Shuster (1 shared paper)Peter M Farr (1 shared paper)Gillian Midgley (1 shared paper)Peter Simon Friedmann (3 shared papers)Jean Sylvia Marshall (1 shared paper)Eric B. Bell (1 shared paper)Brian L Diffey (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Dermatology (5 papers)Contact Dermatitis (2 papers)Lara D. Veeken (1 paper)International Journal of Dermatology (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
G.P. Ford
12 papers receiving 306 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Dermatology 101
- Epidemiology 171
- Immunology 65
- Emergency Medicine 11
- Virology 5
Countries citing papers authored by G.P. Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of G.P. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.P. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.P. Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G.P. Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.P. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.P. Ford. The network helps show where G.P. Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside G.P. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 148 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 56 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 39 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 17 | |
| 7 | PUVA-induced blisters, complement deposition, and damage to the dermoepidermal junction. | 1987 | 15 |
| 8 | 1994 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 12 | Xanthoma disseminatum. | 1985 | 3 |
About G.P. Ford
G.P. Ford is a scholar working on Dermatology, Cell Biology, Immunology, Epidemiology and Hematology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nail Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (2 papers), Histiocytic Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Medicine and Dermatology Studies History (2 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (2 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (1 paper), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (1 paper) and Skin Diseases and Diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (101 citations), Epidemiology (171 citations), Immunology (65 citations), Emergency Medicine (11 citations) and Virology (5 citations). G.P. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include F. A. Ive, Sam Shuster, Peter M Farr, Gillian Midgley, Peter Simon Friedmann, Jean Sylvia Marshall, Eric B. Bell, Brian L Diffey, Michael H. Beck and Richard J. G. Rycroft. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, Contact Dermatitis, Lara D. Veeken, International Journal of Dermatology and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.