Gladys Lee

1.4k citations
23 papers · 764 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Gladys Lee

21 papers receiving 736 citations

Peers

Gladys Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Accounting 312
  • Information Systems and Management 165
  • Strategy and Management 175
  • Finance 42
  • Information Systems 93
Replace Carl Pacini with:
Carl Pacini United States
Brad S. Trinkle United States
Jay C. Thibodeau United States
Colin Ferguson Australia
Errol R. Iselin Australia
Fiona Murray United States
Michael A. Wiles United States
Amr Kotb United Kingdom
Jackie Rees Ulmer United States
Amit Das Qatar
Gladys Lee relative to Carl Pacini United States Carl Pacini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Carl Pacini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gladys Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gladys Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gladys Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gladys Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gladys Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gladys Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gladys Lee. The network helps show where Gladys Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gladys Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gladys Lee Line = papers co-authored together Gladys Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018111
2 201298
3 201797
4 200090
5 201681
6 201879
7 202137
8 201734
9 202025
10 201824
11 201915
12 201814
13 201710
14 201810
15 201010
16 20169
17 20208
18
Whistleblowing on Accounting-Related Misconduct: A Synthesis of the Literature
20187
19
Audit Committees Response to Key Audit Matters and Note Disclosures
20192
20 20182

About Gladys Lee

Gladys Lee is a scholar working on Accounting, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Finance and Strategy and Management, having authored 23 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (17 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (5 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2 papers), Information and Cyber Security (2 papers) and Risk Management in Financial Firms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (312 citations), Information Systems and Management (165 citations), Strategy and Management (175 citations), Finance (42 citations) and Information Systems (93 citations). Gladys Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Neil Fargher, Yu Flora Kuang, Xinning Xiao, Jonathan Jona, Naomi S. Soderstrom, Henk Berkman, Robert G. Collum, Christian Schindler, Bo Qin and Vic Naiker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Accounting Organizations and Society, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact