Giulia Pignata

536 citations
8 papers · 426 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Giulia Pignata

8 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers

Giulia Pignata
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Ophthalmology 349
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 130
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 24
  • Neurology 10
  • Molecular Biology 79
Replace Inas F. Aboobakar with:
Inas F. Aboobakar United States
Taif Anwar Azad Saudi Arabia
Swaantje Grisanti Germany
Vytautas Jašinskas Lithuania
Soon Cheol Cha South Korea
Eva Forsman Finland
Yury Sergeevich Astakhov Russia
M Gavin United Kingdom
Pasquale Plateroti Italy
Giulia Pignata relative to Inas F. Aboobakar United States Inas F. Aboobakar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Inas F. Aboobakar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giulia Pignata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giulia Pignata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giulia Pignata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giulia Pignata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giulia Pignata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giulia Pignata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giulia Pignata. The network helps show where Giulia Pignata may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Giulia Pignata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giulia Pignata Line = papers co-authored together Giulia Pignata links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2016139
2 201587
3 201673
4 201560
5 201526
6 201526
7 201714
8
Long-term Outcomes of a Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked Study of Micro-Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) with Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent and Cataract Surgery vs. Cataract Surgery Alone
20121

About Giulia Pignata

Giulia Pignata is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (1 paper), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper) and Saffron Plant Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (349 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (130 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (24 citations), Neurology (10 citations) and Molecular Biology (79 citations). Giulia Pignata has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Singapore and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Carlo Alessandro Lavia, Federico Maria Grignolo, Giulia Consolandi, Teresa Rolle, Antonio Maria Fea, Marta Zola, Antonio Maria Fea, Marco Nassisi, Eduardo Motolese and Paolo Frezzotti. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Nature Genetics, Clinical ophthalmology and Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact