Giulia Consolandi

494 citations
6 papers · 240 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Giulia Consolandi

6 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Giulia Consolandi
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
  • Ophthalmology 234
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 202
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 25
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 40
  • Neurology 4
Replace Giulia Pignata with:
Giulia Pignata Italy
Naris Kitnarong Thailand
Vanessa Vera United States
Leyla Ali Aljasim Saudi Arabia
Ohoud Owaidhah Saudi Arabia
Mahmoud A. Khaimi United States
Nafees Baig Hong Kong
Oscar Kasner Canada
Fathi El Sayyad Saudi Arabia
Tan Do Vietnam
Giulia Consolandi relative to Giulia Pignata Italy Giulia Pignata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Giulia Pignata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giulia Consolandi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giulia Consolandi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giulia Consolandi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giulia Consolandi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giulia Consolandi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giulia Consolandi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giulia Consolandi. The network helps show where Giulia Consolandi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Giulia Consolandi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giulia Consolandi Line = papers co-authored together Giulia Consolandi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 201579
2 201664
3 201748
4 201525
5 201523
6
Long-term Outcomes of a Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked Study of Micro-Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) with Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent and Cataract Surgery vs. Cataract Surgery Alone
20121

About Giulia Consolandi

Giulia Consolandi is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 6 papers that have together received 240 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (1 paper) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (234 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (202 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (25 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (40 citations) and Neurology (4 citations). Giulia Consolandi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Belarus and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Carlo Lavia, Teresa Rolle, Antonio Maria Fea, Giulia Pignata, Federico Grignolo, Marta Zola, Paolo Frezzotti, I. Motolese, Eduardo Motolese and Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Journal of Ophthalmology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact