Giulia Cimarelli

19 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Giulia Cimarelli
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Pharmacy 49
  • Developmental Biology 24
  • Small Animals 58
  • Genetics 213
  • Social Psychology 119
Replace Fabricio Carballo with:
Fabricio Carballo Argentina
Martina Lazzaroni Austria
Hitomi Chijiiwa Japan
Dorottya Júlia Ujfalussy Hungary
Anjuli L. A. Barber Austria
Gitanjali E. Gnanadesikan United States
Debottam Bhattacharjee India
Linda Scheider Germany
Alessandra Alterisio Italy
Victoria Brelsford United Kingdom
Giulia Cimarelli relative to Fabricio Carballo Argentina Fabricio Carballo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Fabricio Carballo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giulia Cimarelli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giulia Cimarelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giulia Cimarelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giulia Cimarelli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giulia Cimarelli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giulia Cimarelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giulia Cimarelli. The network helps show where Giulia Cimarelli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Giulia Cimarelli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giulia Cimarelli Line = papers co-authored together Giulia Cimarelli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201649
2 202030
3 201926
4 201825
5 201725
6 202225
7 201714
8 202113
9 202412
10 202210
11 20238
12 20208
13 20227
14 20216
15 20174
16 20244
17 20243
18 20242
19 20222
20 20250

About Giulia Cimarelli

Giulia Cimarelli is a scholar working on Genetics, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Small Animals and Pharmacy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (21 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (9 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (8 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers), Infant Health and Development (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (49 citations), Developmental Biology (24 citations), Small Animals (58 citations), Genetics (213 citations) and Social Psychology (119 citations). Giulia Cimarelli has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Hungary and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Zsófia Virányi, Friederike Range, Ludwig Huber, Zsófia Bánlaki, Borbála Turcsán, Sarah Marshall‐Pescini, Roger Mundry, Zsolt Rónai, Mária Sasvári‐Székely and Vedrana Šlipogor. Their work appears in journals such as Learning & Behavior, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences and Animal Behaviour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact