Gitte Wind

20 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Gitte Wind
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Occupational Therapy 37
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 34
  • General Health Professions 81
  • Pharmacy 7
  • Clinical Psychology 35
Replace Cecilia Nordqvist with:
Cecilia Nordqvist Sweden
Steven Wright United States
Kristel De Vliegher Belgium
Valle Coronado‐Vázquez Spain
Sarieh Poortaghi Iran
Heather R. Britt United States
Marcy Cohen Canada
Karolina Lindén Sweden
Majid Heidarijamebozorgi Iran
Laura M. Guzman-Corrales United States
Gitte Wind relative to Cecilia Nordqvist Sweden Cecilia Nordqvist's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.7×
Cecilia Nordqvist · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gitte Wind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gitte Wind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gitte Wind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gitte Wind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gitte Wind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gitte Wind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gitte Wind. The network helps show where Gitte Wind may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Gitte Wind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gitte Wind Line = papers co-authored together Gitte Wind links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200890
2 201239
3 201829
4 201327
5 201725
6 201424
7 201911
8 201710
9 201910
10 20169
11 20219
12 20168
13 20227
14 20215
15 20184
16 20224
17 20213
18 20242
19
På jagt efter relationen:Et studie af den sociale interaktion mellem patient og sygeplejerske
20011
20 20241

About Gitte Wind

Gitte Wind is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pharmacy, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Education (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (3 papers), Nursing care and research (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper) and Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (37 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (34 citations), General Health Professions (81 citations), Pharmacy (7 citations) and Clinical Psychology (35 citations). Gitte Wind has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bodil Sørensen, Nana Folmann Hempler, Annesofie Lunde Jensen, Bente Lomholt Langdahl, Camilla Blach Rossen, Susanne Dalsgaard Reventlow, Kirsten Elisabeth Lomborg, Tine Tjørnhøj‐Thomsen, Bente Martinsen and Claus Vinther Nielsen. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, Community Mental Health Journal, Health & Social Care in the Community, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care and BMC Geriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact