Gine Elsner

29 papers receiving 811 citations

Peers

Gine Elsner
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 26
  • Pharmacology 294
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 245
  • Occupational Therapy 30
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 56
Replace E. M. C. Lau with:
E. M. C. Lau Hong Kong
Selda Sarıkaya Türkiye
Suzan Attar Saudi Arabia
Khaled Al‐Jarallah Kuwait
Delva Shamley South Africa
Hans Malker Sweden
M. Blagojevic United Kingdom
J.N. Katz United States
J B Paolaggi France
S. Moreau France
Gine Elsner relative to E. M. C. Lau Hong Kong E. M. C. Lau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
E. M. C. Lau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gine Elsner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gine Elsner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gine Elsner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gine Elsner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gine Elsner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gine Elsner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gine Elsner. The network helps show where Gine Elsner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gine Elsner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gine Elsner Line = papers co-authored together Gine Elsner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003102
2 200187
3 200983
4 200968
5 199167
6 200550
7 200750
8 199846
9 200844
10 201044
11 200731
12 201031
13 200217
14 200717
15 200716
16 200714
17 200713
18 200912
19 200711
20
[Arthroses of the finger joints and thumb saddle joint and occupationally related factors].
19958

About Gine Elsner

Gine Elsner is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 30 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (11 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers), Occupational and environmental lung diseases (3 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (26 citations), Pharmacology (294 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (245 citations), Occupational Therapy (30 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (56 citations). Gine Elsner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Seidler, Ulrich Bolm‐Audorff, W Beck, Nasreddin Abolmaali, Nikolaus Becker, Alexandra Nieters, Evelin Deeg, Wolfgang Ahrens, Karl‐Heinz Jöckel and Gabriela Petereit-Haack. Their work appears in journals such as International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology and BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact