Gina Smith

502 citations
17 papers · 313 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Gina Smith

17 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Gina Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Virology 46
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 117
  • Infectious Diseases 121
  • Speech and Hearing 38
  • Clinical Psychology 89
Replace Kareem Ghalib with:
Kareem Ghalib United States
Saeeda Paruk South Africa
Yee Ling Hong Kong
Tania Gibbie Australia
İbrahim Yiğit Türkiye
Samuel W. Perry United States
Elizabeth Salomon United States
Dmitry Kats United States
Heather Janisse United States
María José Fuster‐RuizdeApodaca Spain
Gina Smith relative to Kareem Ghalib United States Kareem Ghalib's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Kareem Ghalib · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gina Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Smith. The network helps show where Gina Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gina Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gina Smith Line = papers co-authored together Gina Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2019121
2 201469
3 200233
4 201032
5 201218
6 20196
7 20226
8
An Integrated Approach to Family Work for Psychosis: A Manual for Family Workers
20076
9 20215
10 20084
11 20093
12 19993
13 20182
14 20092
15 20091
16 20101
17 20211

About Gina Smith

Gina Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Economics and Econometrics and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (5 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (4 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (46 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (117 citations), Infectious Diseases (121 citations), Speech and Hearing (38 citations) and Clinical Psychology (89 citations). Gina Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Richard Velleman, Lee D. Mulligan, Graham Dunn, Mary Welford, Steven Jones, Heather Law, Anthony P. Morrison, Cheryl Johnson, James Kelly and Miriam Mutseta. Their work appears in journals such as Otolaryngology, Journal of Aging and Health, Journal of the International AIDS Society, BMJ Global Health and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact