Gina Postma
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Parasitology top 10%
- Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Papers in
-
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 3
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 2
-
- Epilepsy research and treatment 3
- Co-authors
- Aniki Rothová (2 shared papers)Anton M. van Loon (2 shared papers)Lenneke de Visser (2 shared papers)Joke H. de Boer (2 shared papers)Ninette H. ten Dam‐van Loon (2 shared papers)Jolanda D.F. de Groot-Mijnes (2 shared papers)Tos T. J. M. Berendschot (3 shared papers)P. Hardus (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (1 paper)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Ophthalmology (1 paper)Epilepsia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gina Postma
7 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Ophthalmology 247
- Parasitology 55
- Psychiatry and Mental health 62
- Epidemiology 95
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 49
Countries citing papers authored by Gina Postma
This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Postma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Postma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Postma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Postma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Postma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Postma. The network helps show where Gina Postma may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Gina Postma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 115 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 15 |
About Gina Postma
Gina Postma is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (2 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research (1 paper) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (247 citations), Parasitology (55 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (62 citations), Epidemiology (95 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (49 citations). Gina Postma has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aniki Rothová, Anton M. van Loon, Lenneke de Visser, Joke H. de Boer, Ninette H. ten Dam‐van Loon, Jolanda D.F. de Groot-Mijnes, Tos T. J. M. Berendschot, P. Hardus, Margje Schuller and A.J.L. Weersink. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology and Epilepsia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.