Ghada Ismail

20 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Ghada Ismail
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 109
  • Molecular Medicine 130
  • Endocrinology 54
  • Clinical Biochemistry 52
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 34
Replace Anis Karuniawati with:
Anis Karuniawati Indonesia
Monica Licker Romania
A.M. Rogues France
Ilana Livshiz‐Riven Israel
Guilherme Henrique Campos Furtado Brazil
A Malini India
Roger G. Finch United Kingdom
Frank Tverdek United States
Monica K Sikka United States
Maura Salaroli de Oliveira Brazil
Ghada Ismail relative to Anis Karuniawati Indonesia Anis Karuniawati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Anis Karuniawati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ghada Ismail

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ghada Ismail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ghada Ismail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ghada Ismail more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ghada Ismail

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ghada Ismail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ghada Ismail. The network helps show where Ghada Ismail may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ghada Ismail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ghada Ismail Line = papers co-authored together Ghada Ismail links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202088
2 201677
3 201459
4 201552
5 201551
6 199847
7 201640
8 201335
9 202210
10 20196
11 20215
12 20234
13 20184
14 20184
15 20223
16
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Larix decidua: An assessment of factors Influencing the efficiency of gus gene transfer
20042
17 20251
18 20241
19 20201
20
Mupirocin Resistance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit
20141

About Ghada Ismail

Ghada Ismail is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Pharmacology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology and Hepatology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nosocomial Infections in ICU (3 papers), Inflammation biomarkers and pathways (2 papers), Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds (2 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (2 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (2 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (109 citations), Molecular Medicine (130 citations), Endocrinology (54 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (52 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (34 citations). Ghada Ismail has collaborated with scholars based in Egypt, United States and Yemen. Frequent co-authors include Soad Hafez, Maha Talaat, Fernanda C. Lessa, Amani El‐Kholy, Amr Kandeel, Samia A. Girgis, Martin H. Bluth, Maysaa El Sayed Zaki, Meghan Lyman and M. Yehia. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Infection Control, Scientific Reports, QJM, Infection and Drug Resistance and Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact