GF Nash
Impact in
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Hematology top 10%
- Platelet Disorders and Treatments
- Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations 1
- Surgery 3
- Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes 2
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 1
- Co-authors
- AK Kakkar (2 shared papers)M F Scully (1 shared paper)Basil A. Pruitt (1 shared paper)J. A. Moylan (1 shared paper)R. V. P. Hutter (1 shared paper)Donald E. Henson (1 shared paper)Fred Gorstein (1 shared paper)L P Fielding (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (4 papers)The Lancet Oncology (2 papers)PubMed (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
GF Nash
8 papers receiving 467 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Internal Medicine 74
- Hematology 103
- Cancer Research 110
- Oncology 183
- Immunology and Allergy 39
Countries citing papers authored by GF Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of GF Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by GF Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GF Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by GF Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by GF Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by GF Nash. The network helps show where GF Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside GF Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 296 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 84 | |
| 3 | College of American Pathologists Conference XXVI on clinical relevance of prognostic markers in solid tumors. Summary. Members of the Cancer Committee. | 1995 | 45 |
| 4 | Tracheostomy in thermally injured patients: a review of five years' experience. | 1972 | 31 |
| 5 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 2 |
About GF Nash
GF Nash is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (1 paper), Esophageal and GI Pathology (1 paper), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (74 citations), Hematology (103 citations), Cancer Research (110 citations), Oncology (183 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (39 citations). GF Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include AK Kakkar, M F Scully, Basil A. Pruitt, J. A. Moylan, R. V. P. Hutter, Donald E. Henson, Fred Gorstein, L P Fielding, David L. Page and Norman M. Pettigrew. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, The Lancet Oncology and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.