Gerald Vision

415 citations
33 papers · 183 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Gerald Vision

27 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers

Gerald Vision
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • History and Philosophy of Science 58
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 118
  • Philosophy 99
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 34
  • General Psychology 2
Replace Michael Pendlebury with:
Michael Pendlebury South Africa
Joseph L. Camp United States
Bradley Rives United States
Donna M. Summerfield United States
Tom Stoneham United Kingdom
Derek Ball United Kingdom
Nicholas Unwin United Kingdom
Michael Kober United States
Steve Gerrard United States
Murali Ramachandran United Kingdom
Gerald Vision relative to Michael Pendlebury South Africa Michael Pendlebury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Michael Pendlebury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gerald Vision

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerald Vision's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerald Vision with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerald Vision more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerald Vision

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerald Vision. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerald Vision. The network helps show where Gerald Vision may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Gerald Vision, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gerald Vision Line = papers co-authored together Gerald Vision links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200427
2 198521
3 199715
4 199815
5 199811
6 20118
7 19938
8
Re-Emergence: Locating Conscious Properties in a Material World
20117
9 20037
10 19857
11 20056
12 19926
13 19935
14 19744
15 19794
16 20004
17 20084
18 20103
19 20053
20 20173

About Gerald Vision

Gerald Vision is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 33 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper) and Color Science and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (58 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations), Philosophy (99 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (34 citations) and General Psychology (2 citations). Gerald Vision has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Williamson and William Child. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Grazer Philosophische Studien, The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophical Studies and Pacific philosophical quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact