George Park

28 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

George Park
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Human-Computer Interaction 66
  • Archeology 10
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 78
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 30
  • Social Psychology 108
Replace Michael König with:
Michael König Austria
Mike Bradley United Kingdom
Robert Gray United States
David M. Cades United States
Francesco Martino Spain
Dina Stiegemeier Germany
Manuela Quaresma Brazil
Jonathan De Bruin Netherlands
Elisabeth Sussman Canada
Annie W. Y. Ng Hong Kong
George Park relative to Michael König Austria Michael König's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Michael König · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Park

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Park more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Park

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Park. The network helps show where George Park may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Park, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Park Line = papers co-authored together George Park links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199355
2 200654
3 197241
4
The Effect of Driving Simulator Fidelity on Training Effectiveness
200740
5 197533
6 198324
7 201021
8 200516
9 199816
10 200313
11 201310
12 20159
13 20159
14 20118
15 20158
16 19887
17
SCENARIOS PRODUCED BY PROCEDURAL METHODS FOR DRIVING RESEARCH, ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING APPLICATIONS
20037
18 20106
19 20045
20 20184

About George Park

George Park is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Automotive Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (14 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (11 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Older Adults Driving Studies (2 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (66 citations), Archeology (10 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (78 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (30 citations) and Social Psychology (108 citations). George Park has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include R. Wade Allen, Dary Fiorentino, Theodore J. Rosenthal, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Catherine L. Reed, Ralph N. Adams, Gerard P. Palace, Robert J. Lempert, Jerome Edelson and Christopher Boehm. Their work appears in journals such as Current Anthropology, Experimental Brain Research, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Analytical Letters and Social Forces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact