George Matei

860 citations
7 papers · 655 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

George Matei

7 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

George Matei
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 471
  • Structural Biology 10
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 47
  • Biomedical Engineering 226
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 29
Replace E. J. Thoreson with:
E. J. Thoreson United States
Jean‐Pierre Goudonnet France
M. Dreier Switzerland
P. Baschieri Italy
Masami Kageshima Japan
Mark A. Wendman United States
Alma P. Perrino Spain
M. Woszczyna Germany
Susana Moreno‐Flores Spain
Ralf W. Tillmann Germany
George Matei relative to E. J. Thoreson United States E. J. Thoreson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
E. J. Thoreson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Matei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Matei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Matei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Matei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Matei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Matei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Matei. The network helps show where George Matei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside George Matei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Matei Line = papers co-authored together George Matei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2002339
2 2010121
3 2006105
4 200645
5 200530
6 20088
7 20077

About George Matei

George Matei is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Atmospheric Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (2 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (2 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (1 paper), Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (1 paper), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (1 paper) and Material Dynamics and Properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (471 citations), Structural Biology (10 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (47 citations), Biomedical Engineering (226 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (29 citations). George Matei has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include N. A. Burnham, E. J. Thoreson, Peter M. Hoffmann, Shivprasad Patil, Xun Chen, Martyn C. Davies, Clive J. Roberts, Chris S. Hodges, Saul J. B. Tendler and Shah Haidar Khan. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Langmuir, Physical Review Letters and Nanotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact