George Baum

765 citations
34 papers · 668 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

George Baum

33 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers

George Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Bioengineering 96
  • Electrochemistry 95
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 42
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 247
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 87
Replace R W Burnett with:
R W Burnett United States
Bernard Vinet Canada
Marc Lefebvre France
Şakir Arslan Türkiye
H Vergin Switzerland
Richard D. Strickland United States
Adnan El‐Yazigi Saudi Arabia
Frank A. Sedor United States
Bhavin Patel United States
P. J. M. Guelen Netherlands
George Baum relative to R W Burnett United States R W Burnett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
R W Burnett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Baum. The network helps show where George Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside George Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Baum Line = papers co-authored together George Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1957113
2 197199
3 197147
4 195940
5 197332
6 197129
7 197128
8 197224
9 197523
10 196023
11 197422
12 196719
13 195918
14 197214
15 197213
16 195212
17 196411
18 195611
19 196210
20 196110

About George Baum

George Baum is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Organic Chemistry, Electrochemistry, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (7 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (5 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (5 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (96 citations), Electrochemistry (95 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (42 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (247 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (87 citations). George Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include F. Bruce Ward, Roberto de la Plaza Llamas, Cesar A. Castillo, Arthur Schwartz, Harold Shechter, José Luís Carballo, Howard H. Weetall, Christ Tamborski, Mark W. Wolcott and Helen A. Lloyd. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Biochemistry, CHEST Journal, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, American Heart Journal and Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact