George B. Boder
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
- Synthesis and biological activity
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
Papers in
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 2
-
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation 3
- Co-authors
- Gerald A. Poore (3 shared papers)Gordon H. Svoboda (1 shared paper)Kathleen L. King (2 shared papers)Daniel C. Williams (2 shared papers)Richard M. Van Frank (1 shared paper)C. Conrad Johnston (1 shared paper)Richard E. Toomey (1 shared paper)Donald C. Paul (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cancer Letters (2 papers)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (2 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (1 paper)Advances in applied microbiology (1 paper)Endocrinology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George B. Boder
14 papers receiving 422 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Organic Chemistry 188
- Toxicology 17
- Pharmacology 30
- Rheumatology 50
- Molecular Biology 210
Countries citing papers authored by George B. Boder
This map shows the geographic impact of George B. Boder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George B. Boder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George B. Boder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George B. Boder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George B. Boder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George B. Boder. The network helps show where George B. Boder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside George B. Boder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1966 | 146 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 102 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 90 | |
| 4 | Antitumor activity of deacetyl vinblastine amide sulfate (vindesine) in rodents and mitotic accumulation studies in culture. | 1978 | 26 |
| 5 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1966 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1977 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 14 | Preclinical studies with vinglycinate, one of a series of chemically derived analogs of vinblastine. | 1966 | 2 |
About George B. Boder
George B. Boder is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Oncology, Pharmacology and Cell Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (188 citations), Toxicology (17 citations), Pharmacology (30 citations), Rheumatology (50 citations) and Molecular Biology (210 citations). George B. Boder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald A. Poore, Gordon H. Svoboda, Kathleen L. King, Daniel C. Williams, Richard M. Van Frank, C. Conrad Johnston, Richard E. Toomey, Donald C. Paul, Gerald B. Grindey and William J. Ehlhardt. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Letters, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Advances in applied microbiology and Endocrinology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.