Gen Tang

1.2k citations
43 papers · 964 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Gen Tang

43 papers receiving 947 citations

Peers

Gen Tang
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Mechanics of Materials 518
  • Aerospace Engineering 307
  • Materials Chemistry 545
  • Polymers and Plastics 115
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 16
Replace Chunpei Yu with:
Chunpei Yu China
Taixin Liang China
Yongguang Wang China
Zengyun Jian China
Galina Marzun Germany
Baohui Zheng China
Enrico Miorin Italy
Viktor N. Kudiiarov Russia
Saeid Akrami Japan
Gen Tang relative to Chunpei Yu China Chunpei Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Chunpei Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gen Tang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gen Tang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gen Tang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gen Tang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gen Tang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gen Tang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gen Tang. The network helps show where Gen Tang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gen Tang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gen Tang Line = papers co-authored together Gen Tang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014101
2 202067
3 202265
4 201162
5 201450
6 201346
7 202042
8 201737
9 202135
10 201931
11 202330
12 201526
13 202125
14 202325
15 202223
16 201922
17 202122
18 202022
19 202318
20 202118

About Gen Tang

Gen Tang is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 964 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Energetic Materials and Combustion (20 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (12 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (12 papers), Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (10 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (8 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (7 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (6 papers) and Combustion and Detonation Processes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanics of Materials (518 citations), Aerospace Engineering (307 citations), Materials Chemistry (545 citations), Polymers and Plastics (115 citations) and Energy Engineering and Power Technology (16 citations). Gen Tang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Aimin Pang, Changsheng Xie, Dawen Zeng, Shouqin Tian, Zhaoxia Zhou, Liangming Wei, Bin Shan, Xingxing Xu, Yungang Zhang and Yanwei Wen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Materials, ACS Applied Energy Materials, Journal of Applied Polymer Science and Chemical Engineering Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact