Gen Kume

928 citations
57 papers · 715 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Gen Kume

54 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers

Gen Kume
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Aquatic Science 152
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 237
  • Global and Planetary Change 381
  • Oceanography 190
  • Ecology 312
Replace Ernst B. Peebles with:
Ernst B. Peebles United States
Robert T. Leaf United States
Hideaki Nakata Japan
Masato Moteki Japan
Didrik S. Danielssen Norway
JJ Dodson Canada
Johannes IJ. Witte Netherlands
Gisèle Champalbert France
S. Duggan Australia
Grace Klein-Macphee United States
Gen Kume relative to Ernst B. Peebles United States Ernst B. Peebles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ernst B. Peebles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gen Kume

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gen Kume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gen Kume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gen Kume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gen Kume

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gen Kume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gen Kume. The network helps show where Gen Kume may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gen Kume, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gen Kume Line = papers co-authored together Gen Kume links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201058
2 202037
3 200629
4 201029
5 200928
6 200628
7 201827
8 200626
9 202124
10 200023
11 200921
12 202120
13 200420
14 202018
15 200017
16 200817
17 200617
18 202016
19 202016
20 202115

About Gen Kume

Gen Kume is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Oceanography and Aquatic Science, having authored 57 papers that have together received 715 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (36 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (23 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (17 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (12 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (12 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (11 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (8 papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (152 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (237 citations), Global and Planetary Change (381 citations), Oceanography (190 citations) and Ecology (312 citations). Gen Kume has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Atsuko Yamaguchi, Toru Kobari, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Keita Kodama, Hiroaki Shiraishi, Tōru Taniuchi, Masatoshi Morita, Makoto Shimizu, Ichiro Aoki and Yasuyuki Shibata. Their work appears in journals such as Progress In Oceanography, Fisheries Oceanography, Marine Biology, Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science and Fisheries Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact