Gemma Loebenberg
Impact in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Philosophy top 10%
- Mental Health and Psychiatry
Papers in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 6
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 5
-
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 4
- Co-authors
- Rahil Sanatinia (3 shared papers)Helen Tyrer (3 shared papers)Peter Tyrer (3 shared papers)Duolao Wang (3 shared papers)Sylvia Cooper (3 shared papers)Mike Crawford (3 shared papers)Jamie Brown (7 shared papers)Susan Michie (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (3 papers)Personality and Mental Health (2 papers)npj Digital Medicine (1 paper)EClinicalMedicine (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
Gemma Loebenberg
9 papers receiving 104 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Applied Psychology 20
- Philosophy 36
- Clinical Psychology 65
- Psychiatry and Mental health 22
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Loebenberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Loebenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Loebenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Loebenberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Loebenberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Loebenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Loebenberg. The network helps show where Gemma Loebenberg may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Loebenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 |
About Gemma Loebenberg
Gemma Loebenberg is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 108 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (20 citations), Philosophy (36 citations), Clinical Psychology (65 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (22 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (14 citations). Gemma Loebenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Rahil Sanatinia, Helen Tyrer, Peter Tyrer, Duolao Wang, Sylvia Cooper, Mike Crawford, Jamie Brown, Susan Michie, Claire Garnett and Matt Field. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Personality and Mental Health, npj Digital Medicine, EClinicalMedicine and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.