Gemma Loebenberg

483 citations
16 papers · 322 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Gemma Loebenberg

14 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Gemma Loebenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Applied Psychology 34
  • Clinical Psychology 97
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 77
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 73
  • General Health Professions 32
Replace Aya Hamadeh with:
Aya Hamadeh United States
Pascal Jordan Germany
Amador Priede Spain
Maria Christina Hausberg Germany
Michelle Semonella Italy
Ichiro Mashima Japan
Brianna M. Sullivan United States
Tim Batink Netherlands
Louisa Lorenz Switzerland
Silvia Matrai Spain
Gemma Loebenberg relative to Aya Hamadeh United States Aya Hamadeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
Aya Hamadeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Loebenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Loebenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Loebenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Loebenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Loebenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Loebenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Loebenberg. The network helps show where Gemma Loebenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Loebenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Loebenberg Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Loebenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2011115
2 201455
3 201743
4 202327
5 201623
6 202021
7 202412
8 20246
9 20205
10 20235
11 20224
12 20244
13 20241
14 20251
15
Modeling the Potential Health, Health Economic, and Health Inequality Impact of a Large-Scale Rollout of the Drink Less App in England
20250
16 20260

About Gemma Loebenberg

Gemma Loebenberg is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (34 citations), Clinical Psychology (97 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (77 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (73 citations) and General Health Professions (32 citations). Gemma Loebenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Melissa Oldham, Claire V. Garnett, Jamie Brown, Helen Tyrer, Mike Crawford, Rahil Sanatinia, Peter Tyrer, Matt Field, Susan G. Michie and Sylvia Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Personality and Mental Health, EClinicalMedicine, Health Technology Assessment and Addiction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact