Gefu Chi

1.1k citations
22 papers · 976 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Gefu Chi

22 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

Gefu Chi
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 125
  • Pharmacology 123
  • Biochemistry 52
  • Food Science 161
  • Immunology 163
Replace Ji‐Ye Kee with:
Ji‐Ye Kee South Korea
Zuqing Su China
Nam–Hui Yim South Korea
Mengnan Zeng China
Lanxiang Jiang China
Dae-Hun Park South Korea
Lanan Wassy Soromou China
Su‐In Cho South Korea
Huey‐Chun Huang Taiwan
Yinqiang Xin China
Gefu Chi relative to Ji‐Ye Kee South Korea Ji‐Ye Kee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Ji‐Ye Kee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gefu Chi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gefu Chi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gefu Chi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gefu Chi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gefu Chi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gefu Chi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gefu Chi. The network helps show where Gefu Chi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gefu Chi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gefu Chi Line = papers co-authored together Gefu Chi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012185
2 2012160
3 2012113
4 201163
5 201661
6 201253
7 201552
8 201342
9 201542
10 201339
11 201539
12 201235
13 201929
14 201918
15 202214
16 20229
17 20227
18 20227
19
The Present Domestic Pharmacological Advance on Scutellaria Baicalensis
20053
20 20233

About Gefu Chi

Gefu Chi is a scholar working on Immunology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Cancer Research, Pharmacology and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 976 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immune Response and Inflammation (7 papers), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (4 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (4 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (2 papers), Immune cells in cancer (2 papers), Phytochemical and Pharmacological Studies (2 papers) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (125 citations), Pharmacology (123 citations), Biochemistry (52 citations), Food Science (161 citations) and Immunology (163 citations). Gefu Chi has collaborated with scholars based in China, Saint Kitts and Nevis and United States. Frequent co-authors include Haihua Feng, Lanan Wassy Soromou, Xuming Deng, Meixia Huo, Jingyuan Wei, Dacheng Wang, Shuang Guan, Qianchao Wu, Na Chen and Xianxing Xie. Their work appears in journals such as International Immunopharmacology, Molecules, Microbial Pathogenesis, Inflammation Research and Journal of Cellular Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact