G.C. Wake

164 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

G.C. Wake
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Modeling and Simulation 545
  • Numerical Analysis 231
  • Mathematical Physics 213
  • Applied Mathematics 247
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 486
Replace Vitaly Volpert with:
Vitaly Volpert France
J. David Logan United States
Zhi‐Cheng Wang China
Benito M. Chen‐Charpentier United States
Scott W. McCue Australia
Zahir Shah Pakistan
Charles A. Hall United States
Ilyas Khan Saudi Arabia
Mark W. Reichelt United States
Hien Tran United States
G.C. Wake relative to Vitaly Volpert France Vitaly Volpert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Vitaly Volpert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.C. Wake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.C. Wake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.C. Wake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.C. Wake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.C. Wake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.C. Wake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.C. Wake. The network helps show where G.C. Wake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.C. Wake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.C. Wake Line = papers co-authored together G.C. Wake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 177 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002266
2 200398
3 200392
4 197786
5 199066
6 198965
7 200464
8 199061
9 200556
10 200850
11 200450
12 199646
13 199945
14 200343
15 201443
16 200440
17 201339
18 200637
19 200237
20 200434

About G.C. Wake

G.C. Wake is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Mechanics of Materials and Computational Mechanics, having authored 177 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (22 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (17 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (15 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (13 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (13 papers), Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (13 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (12 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (545 citations), Numerical Analysis (231 citations), Mathematical Physics (213 citations), Applied Mathematics (247 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (486 citations). G.C. Wake has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrei Korobeinikov, B.F. Gray, Bruce van Brunt, A.J. Hall, Britta Basse, J. Geoffrey Chase, Geoffrey M. Shaw, David J. N. Wall, Bruce C. Baguley and Peter Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Combustion and Flame, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Differential and Integral Equations and Mathematical Medicine and Biology A Journal of the IMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact