Gary W. Meyer

1.6k citations
62 papers · 1.3k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Gary W. Meyer

60 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Gary W. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 699
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 818
  • Computational Mechanics 302
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 405
  • Geology 72
Replace Imari Sato with:
Imari Sato Japan
Alexander Wilkie Czechia
Craig Donner United States
Chris Tchou United States
Pascal Barla France
Matt Brand United States
Johannes Hanika Germany
Eric P. Lafortune United States
Stephen H. Westin United States
Anton Kaplanyan Germany
Gary W. Meyer relative to Imari Sato Japan Imari Sato's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Imari Sato · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gary W. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gary W. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary W. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary W. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gary W. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary W. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary W. Meyer. The network helps show where Gary W. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gary W. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gary W. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Gary W. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998183
2 1986132
3 1994114
4 198888
5 198886
6 199266
7 200155
8 199554
9 198049
10 198048
11 199841
12 200839
13 199235
14 201327
15 200316
16 199915
17 201114
18 199713
19 199712
20 200212

About Gary W. Meyer

Gary W. Meyer is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (33 papers), Color Science and Applications (29 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (14 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (11 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (11 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Color perception and design (7 papers) and 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (699 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (818 citations), Computational Mechanics (302 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (405 citations) and Geology (72 citations). Gary W. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Donald P. Greenberg, Michael F. Cohen, K. E. Torrance, Holly Rushmeier, Brian Smits, Bei Li, Fernando Reitich, Seunguk Oh, Aihua Liu and Michael Ludwig. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Graphics Forum, The Visual Computer, Displays, ACM Transactions on Graphics and Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact