Gary K. Wolfe
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
Papers in
-
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction 6
-
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- David B. Cohen (1 shared paper)W. David Lewis (1 shared paper)Farah Mendlesohn (1 shared paper)Edward James (1 shared paper)Andrew M. Butler (1 shared paper)Mark Bould (1 shared paper)Joan L. Slonczewski (1 shared paper)Brian Stableford (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Stem Cells (1 paper)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Technology and Culture (1 paper)The Journal of Popular Culture (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Gary K. Wolfe
12 papers receiving 190 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Philosophy 102
- Cultural Studies 58
- Literature and Literary Theory 70
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
- Cognitive Neuroscience 55
Countries citing papers authored by Gary K. Wolfe
This map shows the geographic impact of Gary K. Wolfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary K. Wolfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary K. Wolfe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gary K. Wolfe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary K. Wolfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary K. Wolfe. The network helps show where Gary K. Wolfe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gary K. Wolfe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 122 | |
| 2 | 1973 | 60 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 5 | Critical Terms for Science Fiction and Fantasy: A Glossary and Guide to Scholarship | 1986 | 28 |
| 6 | Evaporating Genres: Essays on Fantastic Literature | 2011 | 19 |
| 7 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 8 | American science fiction | 2012 | 2 |
| 9 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 14 | Peter Straub and Transcendental Horror | 2008 | 0 |
| 15 | 1974 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1976 | 0 |
About Gary K. Wolfe
Gary K. Wolfe is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (6 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper) and Publishing and Scholarly Communication (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (102 citations), Cultural Studies (58 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (70 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (55 citations). Gary K. Wolfe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include David B. Cohen, W. David Lewis, Farah Mendlesohn, Edward James, Andrew M. Butler, Mark Bould, Joan L. Slonczewski, Brian Stableford, István Csicsery‐Rónay and Veronica Hollinger. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cells, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Nature, Technology and Culture and The Journal of Popular Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.