GA Chilvers

3.1k citations
67 papers · 2.7k · h-index 29

Impact in

    • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
    • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
    • Plant Pathogens and Resistance
    • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies

Papers in

GA Chilvers

67 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

GA Chilvers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Plant Science 2.0k
  • Insect Science 527
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 509
  • Cell Biology 467
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 530
Replace F. T. Last with:
F. T. Last United Kingdom
Maurice Lalonde Canada
J.W. Deacon United Kingdom
Juliet C. Frankland United Kingdom
Nicholas Malajczuk Australia
Charles G. Shaw United States
Peggy Ann Schultz United States
J.H. Warcup Australia
Melvin J. Daft United Kingdom
Kurt Ineichen Switzerland
GA Chilvers relative to F. T. Last United Kingdom F. T. Last's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
F. T. Last · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by GA Chilvers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of GA Chilvers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by GA Chilvers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GA Chilvers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by GA Chilvers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by GA Chilvers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by GA Chilvers. The network helps show where GA Chilvers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside GA Chilvers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with GA Chilvers Line = papers co-authored together GA Chilvers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982361
2 1987132
3 1994126
4 197799
5 198597
6 198794
7 196893
8 196589
9 197583
10 198882
11 198676
12 197475
13 199073
14 197568
15 197563
16 197254
17 198052
18 198649
19 197343
20 197739

About GA Chilvers

GA Chilvers is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (33 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (11 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (8 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.0k citations), Insect Science (527 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (509 citations), Cell Biology (467 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (530 citations). GA Chilvers has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. J. Burdon, Fr�d�ric Lapeyrie, Anne E. Ashford, JJ Burdon, L. D. Pryor, Megan H. Ryan, Jeremy J. Burdon, Kathryn A. Thomas, Robert James Seviour and John Laker Harley. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Australian Journal of Botany, Oecologia, Nature and Annals of Applied Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact