G. Werlemark
Impact in
- Horticulture top 5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research
- Botanical Studies and Applications
- Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Papers in
-
- Botanical Studies and Applications 12
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 10
- Berry genetics and cultivation research 10
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 7
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 6
- Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases 6
-
- Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Hilde Nybom (32 shared papers)M. Uggla (7 shared papers)B. Vosman (5 shared papers)G. Esselink (3 shared papers)Larisa Garkava‐Gustavsson (5 shared papers)Thomas S. Kraft (2 shared papers)Xinyan Gao (1 shared paper)Jasna Sehic (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
G. Werlemark
45 papers receiving 903 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Horticulture 23
- Plant Science 756
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 303
- Biochemistry 83
- Genetics 299
Countries citing papers authored by G. Werlemark
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Werlemark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Werlemark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Werlemark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Werlemark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Werlemark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Werlemark. The network helps show where G. Werlemark may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Werlemark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 151 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 86 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 54 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 40 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 34 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 14 |
About G. Werlemark
G. Werlemark is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botanical Studies and Applications (12 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (10 papers), Berry genetics and cultivation research (10 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (8 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (7 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (6 papers), Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (6 papers) and Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (23 citations), Plant Science (756 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (303 citations), Biochemistry (83 citations) and Genetics (299 citations). G. Werlemark has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Czechia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Hilde Nybom, M. Uggla, B. Vosman, G. Esselink, Larisa Garkava‐Gustavsson, Thomas S. Kraft, Xinyan Gao, Jasna Sehic, Leen Leus and Johan Van Huylenbroeck. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, Hereditas, Plant Systematics and Evolution, Agricultural and Food Science and Cytogenetic and Genome Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.