G. W. Smith

1.7k citations
74 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

G. W. Smith

69 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

G. W. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 797
  • Condensed Matter Physics 176
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 693
  • Metals and Alloys 25
  • Structural Biology 11
Replace L. A. Farrow with:
L. A. Farrow United States
J. G. Mullen United States
Takeshi Kojima Japan
J. P. Hobson Canada
Bruce McCarroll United States
С. И. Степанов Russia
U. Maier Switzerland
Timur Halicioğlu United States
H. Klewe‐Nebenius Germany
N. Yoshida Japan
G. W. Smith relative to L. A. Farrow United States L. A. Farrow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
L. A. Farrow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. W. Smith. The network helps show where G. W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. W. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. W. Smith Line = papers co-authored together G. W. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1954163
2 199297
3 199877
4 199067
5 199465
6 199363
7 199159
8 200650
9 200542
10 199038
11 199829
12 199929
13 199028
14 199527
15 199525
16 199524
17 199323
18 199321
19 199421
20 199020

About G. W. Smith

G. W. Smith is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Radiation, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (46 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (18 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (15 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (12 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (11 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (8 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (7 papers) and Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (797 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (176 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (693 citations), Metals and Alloys (25 citations) and Structural Biology (11 citations). G. W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include C. R. Whitehouse, Frederick Nelson, Kurt A. Kraus, M. S. Skolnick, G. J. Denton, R. T. Phillips, D. J. Lovering, J. L. Glasper, A. J. Pidduck and D.R. Wight. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Crystal Growth and Semiconductor Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact