G. Sterrett

40 papers receiving 843 citations

Peers

G. Sterrett
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Cancer Research 227
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 147
  • Oncology 192
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 208
  • Dermatology 35
Replace Leslie K. Diaz with:
Leslie K. Diaz United States
N W Schipper Netherlands
Asif Loya Pakistan
G. Stauch Germany
R.F.M. Schapers Netherlands
Jungsuk An South Korea
F. Kommoss Germany
Tarik M. Elsheikh United States
Richard M. DeMay United States
Georgia Karayannopoulou Greece
G. Sterrett relative to Leslie K. Diaz United States Leslie K. Diaz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Leslie K. Diaz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Sterrett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Sterrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Sterrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Sterrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Sterrett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Sterrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Sterrett. The network helps show where G. Sterrett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Sterrett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Sterrett Line = papers co-authored together G. Sterrett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995331
2 198468
3 200840
4 198240
5 201825
6 199624
7 201524
8 199323
9
Fine needle aspiration cytology of malignant mesothelioma.
198722
10 198418
11 198917
12 200717
13 197916
14 198715
15 197515
16 198914
17 199213
18 199613
19 199213
20 198613

About G. Sterrett

G. Sterrett is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 44 papers that have together received 877 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers), AI in cancer detection (6 papers), Occupational and environmental lung diseases (6 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (4 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (227 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (147 citations), Oncology (192 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (208 citations) and Dermatology (35 citations). G. Sterrett has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Cuba and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include James Harvey, Paul Robbins, Nicholas de Klerk, Ian O. Ellis, H. Dawkins, Sarah E. Pinder, C. Elston, Peter Brown, Κ.B. Shilkin and Jerzy K. Kulski. Their work appears in journals such as Pathology, The Breast, Diagnostic Cytopathology, Journal of Medical Virology and European Journal of Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact