G. Smyth

19 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

G. Smyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Radiation 264
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 161
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 221
  • Otorhinolaryngology 12
  • Genetics 27
Replace Matthew T. Studenski with:
Matthew T. Studenski United States
Karl Bush United States
Daniel Saenz United States
Craig M. Lancaster Australia
Calvin Huntzinger United States
Karl Rasmussen United States
S Anglesio Italy
Bernhard Kroupa Austria
Haibo Lin United States
M Rao United States
G. Smyth relative to Matthew T. Studenski United States Matthew T. Studenski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Matthew T. Studenski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Smyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Smyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Smyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Smyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Smyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Smyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Smyth. The network helps show where G. Smyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Smyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Smyth Line = papers co-authored together G. Smyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201974
2 201367
3 201347
4 201636
5 201911
6 201110
7 20087
8 20217
9 20166
10 20235
11 20125
12 20224
13 20122
14 20202
15 20182
16 20141
17 20201
18 20181
19 20111
20 20240

About G. Smyth

G. Smyth is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics and Surgery, having authored 21 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (14 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (5 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (4 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (3 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (3 papers) and Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (264 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (161 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (221 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (12 citations) and Genetics (27 citations). G. Smyth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include James L. Bedford, Jeffrey C. Bamber, Philip Evans, Mike Thomas, Henry Mandeville, Frank Saran, Liam Welsh, H. McCallum, Charles Kelly and W. Dobrowsky. Their work appears in journals such as Radiotherapy and Oncology, British Journal of Radiology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Clinical Oncology and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact