G. Schwall
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- M. Trede (11 shared papers)B. Chir (2 shared papers)Hans‐Detlev Saeger (4 shared papers)Hon. Hon. (1 shared paper)David R. Farley (2 shared papers)Johannes Flechtenmacher (1 shared paper)B. Rumstadt (2 shared papers)K Forßmann (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British journal of surgery (3 papers)Annals of Surgery (2 papers)DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1 paper)Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie (2 papers)PubMed (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
G. Schwall
11 papers receiving 1.5k citations
G. Schwall's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Oncology 1.4k
- Surgery 1.2k
- Gastroenterology 111
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 603
- Epidemiology 427
Countries citing papers authored by G. Schwall
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Schwall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Schwall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Schwall more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Schwall
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Schwall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Schwall. The network helps show where G. Schwall may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside G. Schwall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Survival After Pancreatoduodenectomy Hit paper breakdown → | 1990 | 883 |
| 2 | 1988 | 323 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 95 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 84 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 68 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 49 | |
| 7 | [Postoperative follow-up in patients with partial Whipple duodenopancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis]. | 1997 | 18 |
| 8 | [Is diagnostic laparoscopy a reliable addition to preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma?]. | 1996 | 3 |
| 9 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 10 | [Multivisceral and extended resection in pancreatic cancer]. | 1992 | 1 |
| 11 | [The Whipple partial duodenopancreatectomy--its value in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis]. | 1995 | 1 |
| 12 | 2009 | 0 |
About G. Schwall
G. Schwall is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Gastroenterology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (3 papers), Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (2 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (2 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.4k citations), Surgery (1.2k citations), Gastroenterology (111 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (603 citations) and Epidemiology (427 citations). G. Schwall has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Trede, B. Chir, Hans‐Detlev Saeger, Hon. Hon., David R. Farley, Johannes Flechtenmacher, B. Rumstadt, K Forßmann, Mirko Singer and M Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, Annals of Surgery, DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.