G. McDarby

1.7k citations
13 papers · 1.1k · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

G. McDarby

13 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

G. McDarby
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 764
  • Human-Computer Interaction 114
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 330
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 134
  • Signal Processing 70
Replace Dean R. Freestone with:
Dean R. Freestone Australia
Philippa J. Karoly Australia
Jorge Riera United States
Nicoletta Nicolaou Cyprus
Jukka Kortelainen Finland
Vadim Grubov Russia
Anahita Adeli United States
Yinghua Wang China
Matteo Fraschini Italy
Ahmet Omurtag United States
G. McDarby relative to Dean R. Freestone Australia Dean R. Freestone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Dean R. Freestone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. McDarby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. McDarby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. McDarby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. McDarby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. McDarby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. McDarby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. McDarby. The network helps show where G. McDarby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside G. McDarby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. McDarby Line = papers co-authored together G. McDarby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2005290
2 2004259
3 2000207
4 2005119
5 2006117
6 201056
7 200634
8 200814
9 20029
10 20026
11
The Use of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Measuring General Autonomic Arousal
20032
12 20052
13
A vocalisation-based drawing interface for disabled children
20041

About G. McDarby

G. McDarby is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (2 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (2 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (2 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (764 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (114 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (330 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (134 citations) and Signal Processing (70 citations). G. McDarby has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Conor Heneghan, Richard B. Reilly, Edmund C. Lalor, Tomás Ward, Charles H. Markham, Ciarán Finucane, Shirley Coyle, Robert D. Burke, Simon P Kelly and Roger O. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Physiological Measurement, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and NeuroImage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact