G. Işık

836 citations
21 papers · 529 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

G. Işık

20 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

G. Işık
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 177
  • Surgery 320
  • Developmental Neuroscience 28
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 27
  • Small Animals 43
Replace M. Özalevli with:
M. Özalevli Türkiye
M. Elhakim Egypt
Grace C. McCarthy United States
Sohair A. Megalla Egypt
A. Van Steenberge Belgium
Rahşan Dilek Okyay Türkiye
Rémi Souron United States
W. P. Blunnie Ireland
Gary D. Skrivanek United States
G. Kaya Türkiye
G. Işık relative to M. Özalevli Türkiye M. Özalevli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Özalevli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Işık

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Işık's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Işık with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Işık more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Işık

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Işık. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Işık. The network helps show where G. Işık may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside G. Işık, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Işık Line = papers co-authored together G. Işık links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200599
2 200592
3 200948
4 200145
5 200339
6 200532
7 200329
8 200427
9 200125
10 200423
11 200219
12 200318
13 200717
14 20064
15 20083
16 20053
17 20102
18 20061
19 20011
20 20011

About G. Işık

G. Işık is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (12 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (8 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (5 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (177 citations), Surgery (320 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (28 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (27 citations) and Small Animals (43 citations). G. Işık has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. Ünlügenç, T. Güler, M. Özalevli, Murat Gündüz, Dilek Özcengiz, İbrahim Ferhat Ürünsak, Yılmaz Güneş, Ferim Günenç, Bahar Kuvaki and Necati Gökmen. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Pediatric Anesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact