G. Hofer

32 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

G. Hofer
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Signal Processing 181
  • Inorganic Chemistry 137
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 118
  • Materials Chemistry 321
  • Artificial Intelligence 152
Replace Guinan Li with:
Guinan Li China
Keita Watanabe Japan
Nathalie Fernando United Kingdom
Yixin Peng China
Yen-Chun Chen Taiwan
Runtang Wang United States
Yuyang Sun China
Yuhao Sun China
Kouji Mitani Japan
G. Hofer relative to Guinan Li China Guinan Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21.5×
Guinan Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Hofer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Hofer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Hofer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Hofer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Hofer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Hofer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Hofer. The network helps show where G. Hofer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Hofer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Hofer Line = papers co-authored together G. Hofer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017156
2 201877
3 201970
4 201945
5 202039
6 200834
7 200532
8 200731
9 201326
10 201825
11 201020
12 201618
13 200716
14 201412
15 201112
16 201711
17 20158
18 20127
19 20127
20 20115

About G. Hofer

G. Hofer is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and Audio Processing (12 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers), Face recognition and analysis (8 papers), Covalent Organic Framework Applications (7 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (4 papers), Human Motion and Animation (4 papers), Graphene research and applications (3 papers) and Music and Audio Processing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (181 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (137 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations), Materials Chemistry (321 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (152 citations). G. Hofer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include A. Dieter Schlüter, Thomas M. Weber, Hiroshi Shimodaira, Korin Richmond, Junichi Yamagishi, Michael Pucher, Michael Berger, Robert Alfred Clark, Martin Kröger and Dimitri Palaz. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Language Resources and Evaluation, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Applied Crystallography and Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact