G. Hockney

1.7k citations
31 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

G. Hockney

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

G. Hockney
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 793
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 115
  • Condensed Matter Physics 85
  • Numerical Analysis 37
  • Mathematical Physics 55
Replace C. Nash with:
C. Nash Ireland
Roman N. Lee Russia
G. Maino Italy
I.G. Halliday United Kingdom
S. M. Roy India
Harvey K. Shepard United States
G. M. Prosperi Italy
C. A. A. de Carvalho Brazil
Jitendra C. Parikh India
C. L. Hammer United States
G. Hockney relative to C. Nash Ireland C. Nash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
C. Nash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Hockney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Hockney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Hockney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Hockney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Hockney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Hockney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Hockney. The network helps show where G. Hockney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Hockney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Hockney Line = papers co-authored together G. Hockney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995152
2 1991130
3 1995120
4 1992113
5 199587
6 198869
7 198562
8 199553
9 198852
10 199552
11 199842
12 199731
13 200431
14 197622
15 198920
16 200410
17 19908
18 20037
19 19916
20 20045

About G. Hockney

G. Hockney is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (16 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (14 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (6 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (5 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (4 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (793 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (115 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (85 citations), Numerical Analysis (37 citations) and Mathematical Physics (55 citations). G. Hockney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include T. Erber, Paul B. Mackenzie, A. Soni, C. Bérnard, Joseph Lykken, Shyamoli Chaudhuri, A. X. El-Khadra, Andreas S. Kronfeld, G. Peter Lepage and Mark Alford. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Journal of Modern Optics, Physical Review A and Quantum Information Processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact