G. Bueß
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- B. Mentges (18 shared papers)M. O. Schurr (21 shared papers)H. Pichlmaier (3 shared papers)Ferenc Hutterer (2 shared papers)K. Manncke (14 shared papers)H. D. Becker (9 shared papers)W Kunert (11 shared papers)Dietrich Hack (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Surgical Endoscopy (23 papers)British journal of surgery (8 papers)Endoscopy (6 papers)RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (2 papers)Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
G. Bueß
102 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Oncology 1.1k
- Surgery 1.3k
- Medical Laboratory Technology 23
- Gastroenterology 79
- Biophysics 67
Countries citing papers authored by G. Bueß
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Bueß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Bueß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Bueß more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Bueß
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Bueß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Bueß. The network helps show where G. Bueß may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Bueß, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation]. | 1984 | 259 |
| 2 | 1988 | 179 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 151 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 130 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 126 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 88 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 84 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 81 | |
| 9 | Review: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). | 1993 | 81 |
| 10 | 1997 | 78 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 77 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 70 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 70 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 62 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 56 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 45 | |
| 17 | Prospective study of the proctographic and functional consequences of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. | 1996 | 44 |
| 18 | 2000 | 41 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 40 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 38 |
About G. Bueß
G. Bueß is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Gastroenterology, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (32 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (27 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (13 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (12 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (10 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (8 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.1k citations), Surgery (1.3k citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (23 citations), Gastroenterology (79 citations) and Biophysics (67 citations). G. Bueß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include B. Mentges, M. O. Schurr, H. Pichlmaier, Ferenc Hutterer, K. Manncke, H. D. Becker, W Kunert, Dietrich Hack, Matthew C. Bobel and W. Isselhard. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, British journal of surgery, Endoscopy, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.