G. Bordes

867 citations
25 papers · 581 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

G. Bordes

25 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

G. Bordes
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • General Decision Sciences 87
  • Management Science and Operations Research 179
  • Economics and Econometrics 345
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 159
  • Safety Research 38
Replace S. K. Chakrabarti with:
S. K. Chakrabarti United States
Jesús Marín‐Solano Spain
Dieter Sondermann Germany
Jan Sładkowski Poland
E. M. Bolger United States
Émile Borel United States
J. Aczél Canada
Eran Shmaya United States
Thomas E. Armstrong United States
G. Bordes relative to S. K. Chakrabarti United States S. K. Chakrabarti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
S. K. Chakrabarti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Bordes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Bordes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Bordes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Bordes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Bordes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Bordes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Bordes. The network helps show where G. Bordes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside G. Bordes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Bordes Line = papers co-authored together G. Bordes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197697
2 199590
3 197665
4 198342
5 198937
6 199130
7 198825
8 199324
9 199024
10 198321
11 199318
12 199217
13 199117
14 199215
15 199013
16 199512
17 196311
18 20055
19 19834
20 20114

About G. Bordes

G. Bordes is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (13 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (7 papers), Economic theories and models (7 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (6 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (5 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (87 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (179 citations), Economics and Econometrics (345 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (159 citations) and Safety Research (38 citations). G. Bordes has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include B. Van Eijk, Michel Le Breton, Douglas H. Blair, Jerry S. Kelly, Kotaro Suzumura, Jeffrey S. Banks, Nicolaus Tideman, Bertrand M. Roehner, Maurice Salles and F. Anselmo. Their work appears in journals such as Social Choice and Welfare, Journal of Economic Theory, Advances in Applied Probability, Physics Letters B and International Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact