G. Akerman

760 citations
18 papers · 119 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 4
    • Uterine Myomas and Treatments 4
    • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 3
    • Gynecological conditions and treatments 2

G. Akerman

18 papers receiving 112 citations

Peers

G. Akerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 32
  • Reproductive Medicine 19
  • Dermatology 10
  • Surgery 38
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 16
Replace Madleen Lemaître with:
Madleen Lemaître France
Santiago Scasso Uruguay
Sedat Akgöl Türkiye
Melissa Bradbury Spain
Camille Mimoun France
Isabelle Ronda France
Debora Verri Italy
M Zida Burkina Faso
Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh Iran
Jay Lodhia Tanzania
G. Akerman relative to Madleen Lemaître France Madleen Lemaître's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Madleen Lemaître · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Akerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Akerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Akerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Akerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Akerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Akerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Akerman. The network helps show where G. Akerman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside G. Akerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Akerman Line = papers co-authored together G. Akerman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200718
2 200817
3 200714
4 200712
5 200711
6 20107
7 20086
8 20136
9 20085
10 20074
11 20074
12 20083
13 20083
14 20082
15 20082
16 20102
17
[Hysteroscopic injection in sentinel node biopsy for endometrial cancer increases the frequency of para-aortic drainage: Is it necessary to reconsider the role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy?].
20072
18 20081

About G. Akerman

G. Akerman is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Reproductive Medicine and Cancer Research, having authored 18 papers that have together received 119 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (4 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (32 citations), Reproductive Medicine (19 citations), Dermatology (10 citations), Surgery (38 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (16 citations). G. Akerman has collaborated with scholars based in France. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Barranger, Olivier Morel, C. Malartic, Roman Rouzier, Bernard‐Jean Paniel, D. Cabrol, Alexandre Mignon, Vassilis Tsatsaris, François Goffinet and Alexandre Bricou. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Cancer Research, Bulletin du Cancer, PubMed, Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité and Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact