F.T. Cross

38 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers

F.T. Cross
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 326
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 351
  • Cancer Research 149
  • Chemical Health and Safety 6
  • Radiation 55
Replace J.W. Stather with:
J.W. Stather United Kingdom
J. Lafuma France
E. Vasilenko Russia
M. Ghiassi-Nejad Iran
R.E. Filipy United States
V. F. Khokhryakov Russia
N. B. Shagina Russia
A.L. Batchelor United Kingdom
Peter G. Groer United States
F.T. Cross relative to J.W. Stather United Kingdom J.W. Stather's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
J.W. Stather · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F.T. Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.T. Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.T. Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.T. Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.T. Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.T. Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.T. Cross. The network helps show where F.T. Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F.T. Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F.T. Cross Line = papers co-authored together F.T. Cross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198578
2 199165
3 198252
4 199346
5 199942
6 199441
7
In vitro exposure of mammalian cells to radon: dosimetric considerations.
199136
8 198132
9 198427
10 198825
11 199125
12 199422
13 199321
14 198615
15 199215
16
Radon-induced deletions in human cells: role of nonhomologous strand rejoining.
199215
17 199313
18 20048
19 19928
20
Cytotoxic, clastogenic, and mutagenic response of mammalian cells exposed in vitro to radon and its progeny
19925

About F.T. Cross

F.T. Cross is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Global and Planetary Change and Cancer Research, having authored 38 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (24 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (11 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (11 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (8 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (4 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (4 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (326 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (351 citations), Cancer Research (149 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (6 citations) and Radiation (55 citations). F.T. Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R. F. Jostes, Naomi H. Harley, W. Hofmann, G.E. Dagle, R.F. Palmer, B.O. Stuart, R.E. Filipy, Robert Busch, John K. Wiencke and Sheldon Wolff. Their work appears in journals such as Health Physics, Radiation Research, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Environmental Health Perspectives and Annals of the ICRP.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact