Fritz C. Eilber

115 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Fritz C. Eilber
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Biotechnology 955
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2.6k
  • Oncology 1.1k
  • Rheumatology 556
  • Neurology 427
Replace Takafumi Ueda with:
Takafumi Ueda Japan
Mary Louise Keohan United States
Maija Tarkkanen Finland
Sophie Piperno‐Neumann France
Frédéric Chibon France
Makio Mukai Japan
Erinn Downs‐Kelly United States
Ira J. Spiro United States
Göran Stenman Sweden
Stefania Benini Italy
Fritz C. Eilber relative to Takafumi Ueda Japan Takafumi Ueda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
Takafumi Ueda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fritz C. Eilber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fritz C. Eilber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fritz C. Eilber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fritz C. Eilber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fritz C. Eilber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fritz C. Eilber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fritz C. Eilber. The network helps show where Fritz C. Eilber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fritz C. Eilber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fritz C. Eilber Line = papers co-authored together Fritz C. Eilber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001249
2 2013244
3 2003199
4 2008153
5 2007151
6 2008140
7 2009137
8 2012135
9 2009134
10 2004122
11
Alpha-fetoprotein-specific genetic immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
1999117
12 2009115
13 2004114
14 200998
15 201698
16 200890
17 201689
18 200988
19 201286
20
p53 selective and nonselective replication of an E1B-deleted adenovirus in hepatocellular carcinoma.
199986

About Fritz C. Eilber

Fritz C. Eilber is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biotechnology, Oncology, Biomedical Engineering and Genetics, having authored 121 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (63 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (36 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (27 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (23 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (10 papers), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (10 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (7 papers) and Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (955 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.6k citations), Oncology (1.1k citations), Rheumatology (556 citations) and Neurology (427 citations). Fritz C. Eilber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Dry, Frederick R. Eilber, Scott D. Nelson, William D. Tap, J J Eckardt, Arun S. Singh, Gerald Rosen, Johannes Czernin, Noah Federman and Nicholas M. Bernthal. Their work appears in journals such as Oncotarget, Cell Cycle, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, Annals of Surgery and Sarcoma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact