Friederike Veit

11 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Friederike Veit
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Pharmacy 47
  • Speech and Hearing 33
  • Surgery 197
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 88
  • Gastroenterology 15
Replace Kathleen Falkenstein with:
Kathleen Falkenstein United States
Katie A. Fritz United States
Michel Deneyer Belgium
Carly A. Hughes United Kingdom
Robert H. Squires United States
Anne Rowan-Legg Canada
Sandra Williams United States
Katie Foxcroft Australia
Ann‐Cathrine Bramhagen Sweden
Susan de Jersey Australia
Friederike Veit relative to Kathleen Falkenstein United States Kathleen Falkenstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Kathleen Falkenstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Friederike Veit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Friederike Veit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friederike Veit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friederike Veit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Friederike Veit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friederike Veit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friederike Veit. The network helps show where Friederike Veit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Friederike Veit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Friederike Veit Line = papers co-authored together Friederike Veit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2010260
2 199558
3 199645
4 199930
5 199815
6 199412
7 199810
8 19959
9 20004
10
Adolescent suicide attempts: a general practice perspective.
19954
11 19961

About Friederike Veit

Friederike Veit is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (3 papers), Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology (1 paper), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper) and Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (47 citations), Speech and Hearing (33 citations), Surgery (197 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (88 citations) and Gastroenterology (15 citations). Friederike Veit has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and American Samoa. Frequent co-authors include Lena Sanci, Paul E. O’Brien, Margaret Anderson, Paul R. Burton, Cheryl Laurie, Wendy A. Brown, Susan M. Sawyer, Eldho Paul, Doris Young and John Dixon. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Adolescent Health, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, JAMA and Drug and Alcohol Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact