Frederick W. Smith

2.5k citations
56 papers · 2.1k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick W. Smith

54 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Frederick W. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.3k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.6k
  • Ecology 638
  • Insect Science 204
  • Environmental Engineering 202
Replace Robert S. Seymour with:
Robert S. Seymour United States
Jens Peter Skovsgaard Denmark
Ralph L. Amateis United States
Helena M. Henttonen Finland
W. L. Mason United Kingdom
Don C. Bragg United States
Hiroaki Ishii Japan
Réjean Gagnon Canada
Shongming Huang Canada
Jérôme Chave France
Frederick W. Smith relative to Robert S. Seymour United States Robert S. Seymour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert S. Seymour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Smith. The network helps show where Frederick W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick W. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Frederick W. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984148
2 2001137
3 1988115
4 2006109
5 1988106
6 199294
7 199189
8
Factors influencing the amount and distribution of leaf area of pine stands
199487
9 200585
10 199080
11 198173
12 198972
13 200862
14 199757
15 199955
16 199754
17 200853
18 199352
19 200551
20 200646

About Frederick W. Smith

Frederick W. Smith is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (26 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (20 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (10 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (8 papers), Forest Management and Policy (7 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.6k citations), Ecology (638 citations), Insect Science (204 citations) and Environmental Engineering (202 citations). Frederick W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include James N. Long, Wayne D. Shepperd, Leigh B. Lentile, Tara L. Keyser, Richard D. Laven, Gregory H. Aplet, Mike A. Battaglia, David A. Sampson, Sigrid C. Resh and David R. Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Science, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Western Journal of Applied Forestry and International Journal of Wildland Fire.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact