Frederick W. Carson
Impact in
- Virology top 10%
- HIV Research and Treatment
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
Papers in
-
- Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms 4
-
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms 6
- Co-authors
- Paul Bickart (1 shared paper)John Jacobus (1 shared paper)Edward G. Miller (1 shared paper)Kurt Mislow (1 shared paper)Bernard R. Brooks (3 shared papers)Richard W. Pastor (2 shared papers)Richard M. Venable (2 shared papers)Emil Thomas Kaiser (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (5 papers)Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (4 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frederick W. Carson
13 papers receiving 408 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Virology 80
- Organic Chemistry 265
- Cancer Research 82
- Oncology 65
- Biochemistry 17
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Carson
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Carson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Carson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Carson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Carson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Carson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Carson. The network helps show where Frederick W. Carson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. Carson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1968 | 210 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 88 | |
| 3 | 1966 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1972 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1964 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1965 | 18 | |
| 8 | 1965 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1975 | 17 | |
| 11 | 1967 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1977 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 0 |
About Frederick W. Carson
Frederick W. Carson is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Oncology and Virology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (6 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (4 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (3 papers), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (1 paper) and HIV Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (80 citations), Organic Chemistry (265 citations), Cancer Research (82 citations), Oncology (65 citations) and Biochemistry (17 citations). Frederick W. Carson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Bickart, John Jacobus, Edward G. Miller, Kurt Mislow, Bernard R. Brooks, Richard W. Pastor, Richard M. Venable, Emil Thomas Kaiser, C. B. Storm and Shoji AWAZU. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.