Frederick Turner

33 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Frederick Turner
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Signal Processing 105
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 58
  • Computer Networks and Communications 107
  • Software 14
  • Cultural Studies 28
Replace Paul Crowther with:
Paul Crowther United Kingdom
Pieter Vermeulen Belgium
John Locke United States
Stéfan Sinclair Canada
Nicolas Ruwet France
Michel Chion France
Carol Vernallis United States
Gerrit Bloothooft Netherlands
Matthew Sharpe Australia
Philip Tagg Canada
Frederick Turner relative to Paul Crowther United Kingdom Paul Crowther's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Paul Crowther · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Turner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Turner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Turner. The network helps show where Frederick Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Turner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Turner Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Turner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017118
2 198047
3 198841
4
Biopoetics: Evolutionary Explorations in the Arts
199940
5
Natural Classicism: Essays on Literature and Science
198528
6 198121
7 197321
8
The Culture of Hope: A New Birth of the Classical Spirit
199514
9 199113
10
Beauty: The Value of Values
199213
11 198610
12 199010
13 19749
14 19867
15 19956
16 19905
17 19965
18 19994
19 20054
20 19903

About Frederick Turner

Frederick Turner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cultural Studies, having authored 47 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (1 paper) and Academic Freedom and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (105 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (58 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (107 citations), Software (14 citations) and Cultural Studies (28 citations). Frederick Turner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pete Burnap, Kevin Jones, Francis Jennings, Ernst Pöppel, Brett Cooke, Charles L. Sanford, Virgil Nemoianu, P. G. Edwards, Robert Bradford and Robin W. Doughty. Their work appears in journals such as Society, The American Historical Review, American Behavioral Scientist, Journal of Forestry and Journal of American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact